Real public-corpus walkthrough

Run first. Compare only after the model is done.

Analyze three released interviews about open science, then compare exact coded source regions with the study author’s separately stored coding.

Checking demo…Loading the local execution state.
1

Verify the sample

Confirm source, rights, frozen selection, and the single-coder comparison boundary.

2

Run QC blind

The model sees source interviews only. Human codes and spans remain in a separate file.

3

Inspect the difference

Use region overlap as a diagnostic, then step into exact human and system records.

4

Continue the research workflow

Follow one explicit real-to-fixture path through analysis, review, and a sourced write-up.

1 · Public sample

Zenodo record 17630137, released under CC BY-SA 4.0. The three shortest English transcripts bound demo time and spend; they were not selected for favorable results.

2 · Run the analysis

Exhaustive mode requires a coded/no-code decision for every canonical segment. Actual calls and cost are read from execution traces after the run; the dollar values below are hard admission limits, not estimates.

Starts real provider calls. Human categories and applications are not present in the project, pipeline context, prompts, or checkpoints.

3 · Human comparison

This is label-agnostic exact-region overlap against one study author’s public coding. It can reveal missed or overly broad source coverage; it is not “accuracy” or agreement.

Complete the real run to unlock comparison.

4 · Integrated research walkthrough

Continue through the retained product in order. Every step states whether it uses the real public corpus, a deterministic synthetic fixture, or a failure boundary.

Loading the integrated walkthrough…